ipcc con job?, page-5

Hi butcherboy,
I'm not a scientist, just making the point that every error found so far appears to be over the top.
There appears to be a strong bias running through the reports.
I'm used to scientists being very sceptical, and poo-poohing just about everything unless there is hard, verifiable evidence.
That doesn't appear to be the case, for me, about AGW.

But I also know, and will admit, that I must have a Confirmation Bias about this subject, as I just don't believe the claims being made, at the moment anyway.

I wonder if anyone who DOES believe the matter is settled can be honest enough with themselves to think about whether they also may have a similar bias to their own opinions.