A misunderstanding is that what it is mjp. I am sorry you have misunderstood your own science.
So now it is a PERHAPS jopo has misunderstood it? And then you follow up with a BUT there is a element of flat earth in the models. LOL And dont forget to remind yourself I told you what your own emissions height is that you disagreed with
Yeah great work mjp.
Personally one does not need a peer reviewed paper to establish that the formula that the settled science uses as a base for GLOBAL CLIMATE MODELS assumes the EARTH is FLAT.
Occam's Razors offers up a much simpler suggestions that EVEN the LAWS of Thermodynamics and Physics confirm why we have the temperatures we have. And they dont need to introduce a untested mathematical construct to explain the temperatures we do have!
Yes mjp LAWS of SCIENCE something your side has not been able to provide let alone provide empirical observational or experimental proof that CO2 can cause back radiation. Let alone explain the physical mechanism that causes the atmospheres emission point to raise.
All we get is because we know and because
Stick to Occam Razor. It historically has been the best advice anyone can receive! Take the least complicated one mjp
Laws of Science or a Untested hypothesis from alarmist.
