One minute Flat Earth theory of calculation is more than ample for climate models. And then the next it is a very complicated process.
It is a FLAT EARTH model that does not represent what the SUN can do to our planet. Furthermore your last grasp at clinging on also mentions it cannot model a Spherical earth as it becomes to complicated. Now pull the other mjp. These guys are playing with you!
Now you only use this flat earth model because you believe the SUN cannot melt ice without greenhouse gases. That is the reality of it. It is how it is sold to sheep and to children
I have shown you that the SUN clearly can and NASA have even said it so!
I have also commented numerous times and not one of you has responded that accepted LAWS in Science replicate very accurately our heat just by using temperature and pressure. No need for requiring greenhouse gases. You are in denial about this.
Zeller / Nikolov and also Holmes spring to mind. Different approaches different methodology but exactly the same answer.
NO GREENHOUSE required. And all they did was use vetted NASA planetary data and Observed LAWS of Science. As Zeller says.
This is not a theory. It is a discovery.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- IPCC energy budget logic and then the real World
IPCC energy budget logic and then the real World, page-133
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 37 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, MD & CEO
Charles Armstrong
MD & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online