Zonetrader - why don't you read the IPCC reports and find out for yourself?
It's obvious that donna's book a distortion of the facts. By all accounts she can't even get the science right, let alone the scientists. Even just reading the people she quotes who don't agree with mainstream science - heck Nils Axel-Morner the famous water dowser and William Gray? Give us a break! If they disagree then let them refute it in the peer reviewed literature so that it can be scrutinised by expert scientists. Not in the gutter press of climate denialism.
brotherb - none of the posts are attacking the poster as far as I can tell. They are all about the content.
Do you have anything to offer other than concern trolling? (Why did you reply in that tone to Greenhart? Greenhart was pointing out distortions of fact in the content of the book.)
I agree the level of deceitfulness is disturbing. It is all intended to falsely cast doubts, given no-one has been able to refute the science.
That's one of the main reasons why the USA in particular has not done enough at the national level to curb emissions.
BTW - the author of the Quadrant article who picked out the Pauchari quote thinks he's wrong and that the various economic systems in the world are perfect - he ought to tell the 99% that they can all go home and 'eat cake'.
