ipcc scientist declares global warming a hoax , page-59

  1. 1,219 Posts.
    BillyBongo says:

    "Howard though, has imo made a valid decision to keep our coal usage and sales alive. Surely this is far better than knee jerk reactions that would have a negative impact on the country as a whole."

    Nobody disagrees that suddenly stopping fossil
    fuel usage and exports would damage the
    economy and cause great social harm.

    What we *DO* disagree on is what
    should happen next:

    (A) Chuck a few token measures at
    Global Warming to kid voters that
    something positive is being done
    while giving a nod and wink
    to carbon salesmen that it's
    business as usual, or

    (B) Begin a massive transformation
    of the Australian economy from
    its primitive Global Warming
    status to a hum-dinger of
    a non-fossil-reliant NEW
    economy but only
    shut down fossil-
    based industries
    as non-fossil jobs
    come on stream.

    My big worry is more rational nations
    will steal a march on Australia
    (they are already poaching our
    brightest non-fossil brains
    and non-fossil technologies)
    to use them as weapons of
    mass economic destruction
    against us in the new war
    on primitive economies
    that doze in the sun
    while others build
    highly intelligent
    massive solar
    industries:

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.