IPD chart, page-923

Just to be clear, this is a stock forum and participants are fully entitled to share their views, whether they agree with your endorsement of the new management or not. No one needs to apply for a board position to have an opinion on how a company is run, especially if they’re a shareholder. You want all shareholders to be on the board?

Dismissing critical perspectives as lacking “courage” or “understanding” completely misses the point of open forums like this, different perspectives and healthy debate. Blind loyalty and gatekeeping is naive (even stupid). In business, you need diversity of opinions; how else will you identify shortfalls, non-performance and "blind spots". You blindly endorse the new lot while others (me included) are more objective and want results.

Step back and let the market tell you what it thinks of the new management, its current performance and potential future performance - 15 cents (when the ASX was down) to 3.2 cents (ASX up) - that must tell you something! A massive destruction of shareholder wealth. But you rationalise it away. Even "two dags" admitted their non-performance, calling it a "small hiatus" (an understatement)

The cash from the capital raise at 15 cents is gone. Breakeven is goal number 3 or 4.
We need 100 s of units sold per quarter not 30 or 40 units.
Whatever happened to McKessons and the 600 sites two dags talked about this time last year?

Maybe apply the same measures you did for throwing the last lot out. But I think that decision was emotional, so you can't and don't want to admit a mistake.

In one of your posts, you said the stock was a "buy" based on fundamentals. I've asked several times what they are, and you ignore my request because?
Maybe the fundamentals are shocking!

But please keep buying - cheap yum yums and getting cheaper.