@Bigowey yep it will come back up - but a little bit of grease...

@Bigowey yep it will come back up - but a little bit of grease from a 'shareholders group' might help it.

@wingedwarrior that is a good idea - even perhaps @anatol could be our leader in (initially) a loosely organised group seeking news and action - and failing that to gather support for a friendly T/O by a company with proven ability to build a Li business in North America. IMO LTR would be ideal, but they no doubt have their own LT plans.
If nothing else just create some waves so that no one thinks small retail holders are unimportant and their value can be trodden down at will.

@sonu2alok Thanks for your support of what is still nothing but an idea. Maybe if we just let it grow we might be surprised by how many holders are sufficiently interested to say so, and get a turnaround in attitude.

IMO the degree of excellence of a Company in its treatment of the shareholders (the owners and main stakeholders) is in the quality of the Company Website, and its Presentations,
IR1's website is hopeless, it offers very few facts or forward looking plans.
And there are some glaring errors. ie Beecher lies within a 500m radius and has pegmatites with a strike length of 2 km. And with patented claims of 15 acres and elsewhere of 20 Ha
And as for Pressos, the website simply says '2024 - to be released.'

See next post for detail.

Conclusion is they simply dont care.