irreducible complexity, page-14

Wow, you read an article on wiki, case closed.

"It has no basis in science."

Neither do wiki articles, so maybe you could make the effort to EXPLAIN 'scientifically' why IC isn't valid. That way we can all move to a better understanding of your complaint. Or are you just having a tanty?

Though I'm pretty sure your 'explanations' have already been addressed:

http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-2-chapter-10-argument-irreducible-complexity