Squid this would never get off the ground. John Wylie/Tannarra Capital had a large shareholding so he was always trying to get the SP up.
This is simply a case of a very split board and the biggest shareholder AA got his way. The other directors up and left.
The Latitude deal fell over because AA did not like it and ran a strong campaign to get it stopped. It was a complicated and lengthy deal and the BNPL landscape was changing in front of our eyes. The BNPL model unravelled around the world as it is not sustainable. Have a look at ZIP and Sezzle etc they have all tanked and now are in a fight to even exist. Inflation and higher interest rates and the dire impact on BNPL business models proved that BNPL is a flawed business model.
I do not believe any law firm contemplating a class action would get funding and without funding no lawyer would be interested.
Just put your efforts into understanding what HUMM is doing now. You might get a pleasant surprise on the cash NPAT at the half year results.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Is a Class Action against former board warranted?
Squid this would never get off the ground. John Wylie/Tannarra...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add HUM (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
50.5¢ |
Change
0.025(5.21%) |
Mkt cap ! $248.1M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
48.0¢ | 50.5¢ | 47.5¢ | $173.0K | 353.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1050 | 50.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
50.5¢ | 27568 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1050 | 0.500 |
1 | 60000 | 0.480 |
1 | 21052 | 0.475 |
2 | 3208 | 0.470 |
1 | 10000 | 0.440 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.505 | 27568 | 1 |
0.515 | 64001 | 3 |
0.520 | 49169 | 4 |
0.525 | 19008 | 2 |
0.530 | 27660 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
HUM (ASX) Chart |