The whole tone of the article smacks of angry little man syndrome.
For a start from what I have read in recent times there have been quite a few of the large companies that have mooted that they will be releasing some form of laser display in the near future. (Commercialisation probably medium term)
Also he intimates that the company is some sort of fake front, all though I believe that a number of political delegates from Australia recently toured the premises of ARR in China? If its fake I wonder what was shown?
Even the use of language and style of writing in the article makes it appear that the supposedly impartial media has some sort of strong personal view that is anti ARR.
Would like to know what the writer has against ARR.
I am going to forward the article to Scott Wilkie and will let you know the response when I receive one.
