Bill Shorten has a different view than Anthony Albanese when it comes to the use of gas as a transitional energy source, of which it was clear the other day in parliament that The opposition leader was saying that Labor will have nothing to do with using gas in any form or manner in such process. yet Bill shorten was saying clearly he believes that gas should be used as a transitional energy source in a seperate interview.
Is this a parting of the ways, it almost seems as if someone needs to clarify who is running the party with this sort of policy, or are they allowed to disagree because it is healthy debate
Looks like somehting is brewing maybe about who holds the reins.
