If Cruickshank arranges a full Take-over, then all shareholders will be treated equally, except that Cruickshank looses a very well paid job.
However, if he arranges an asset sale, then AZZ will always trade below its NTA and shareholders will be locked into a very high risk exploration company.
In the absence of the checks and balances of a truely independent Board, what is to stop him making a 'selfish' decision?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AZZ
- Is Cruickshank aligned to Shareholders?
Is Cruickshank aligned to Shareholders?
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AZZ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, CEO & MD
Anthony Noble
CEO & MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online