Hey Guys. Just wanted to quickly re-iterate a question:Why is it...

Hey Guys.

Just wanted to quickly re-iterate a question:
Why is it that none of you, or the company seem to be willing to answer the question of why the company, having agreed to a clause which gives away their Litigation rights with regard to radioactive materials ever been disclosed to shareholders? You guys say I, and the direct quote of the addendum published in the Sermitsiaq February 17th edition see HTTP://sermitsiaq.aq, are wrong.

Again I quote the exact language of the Addendum currently attached to GGG's Exploration license from that Sermitsiaq article by Merete Lindstrom.

"If the licensee applies for notification of authorization for the use of radioactive elements, cf. point301, the Naalakkersuisut may freely and for no reason reject the application. The application may be rejected, among other things, due to a political or administrative decision not to grant permission for the use of radioactive elements. A rejection of the application entails no obligations and no liability, including no liability. for the Greenland Home Rule Government, the Naalakkersuisut or the Mineral resources Directorate."

Again the above is the exact quote published in the Sermitsiaq Article. THe article goes on to say "The right to reject Greenland Minerals continues to apply, is the answer in all four section 37 questions."

So again, can anyone show me where the company has ever properly disclosed this to we shareholders or to the ASX or the ASIC?

Don't you think it is a material change to their license? Please let me know your thoughts.

Ciao
Dull1122