Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

None, would not be interested. 153 times the average Australia....

First 10 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Michaelirish

24,130 Posts.

410

16/08/16

11:18

Post #: 18526701
Share

Originally posted by skiptdouglas ↑

So you want to pay someone the average wage, to run a billion dollar bank which earned like 9 billion last year ?
I have no issues with large proportional salaries , if they're making the profit then all good

Maybe the justification here is, you think 153 average Australian could run the bank?
Out of curiosity which large bank have your run?

Expand

None, would not be interested.
153 times the average Australia.
Did Mr Narev contribute more than 153 teachers , nurses, healthcare workers?
This is out of proportion
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Bitcoin hits fresh record as instos pile into BTC ETFs – and Trump helps, too

The Altcoin Landscape (Part 1): Key alternative cryptocurrencies to watch

Week 44 Wrap: Relatively boring week ahead of US election; HotCopper's most watched; Oz inflation at 3.5%

Aussie inflation seemingly hit a 3 year low. So why's the ASX200 red?

Making money: How many microcaps should be in an investor's portfolio?

What each US election outcome would mean for Australian companies & investors

MIN

Movers and Shakers: Zip Co, MinRes, Kuniko, more – The week's top ASX gainers

'We're looking': Nickel-rich Indonesia sounds graphite warning to Aus producers

MKT

The ASX can overlook its Telecomm small-caps. Here’s one diversified brand with an international footprint

Palladium's the newest geopolitical hot commodity. But ASX exposure is limited

There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...

First 10 Last