Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Yep, it should not be gender specific. That said, it should be...

First 11 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Leapzig

5,687 Posts.

454

22/08/24

11:07

Post #: 75321811
Share

Originally posted by UniversalTrader: ↑

100% agree focus on the violence don't make it gender specific. Sure we need to empower victims to get out of bad situations but focusing on gender only results in others being victimized for gain particularly in the family court system.

Expand

Yep, it should not be gender specific. That said, it should be race specific. Divi up the numbers by race, i.e. Aboriginals, Muslims, Anglos etc.. We can then work out the % stats against current population numbers.
10 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

MKT

The ASX can overlook its Telecomm small-caps. Here’s one diversified brand with an international footprint

Aussie inflation seemingly hit a 3 year low. So why's the ASX200 red?

What each US election outcome would mean for Australian companies & investors

Palladium's the newest geopolitical hot commodity. But ASX exposure is limited

'We're looking': Nickel-rich Indonesia sounds graphite warning to Aus producers

The Altcoin Landscape (Part 1): Key alternative cryptocurrencies to watch

MIN

Movers and Shakers: Zip Co, MinRes, Kuniko, more – The week's top ASX gainers

Week 44 Wrap: Relatively boring week ahead of US election; HotCopper's most watched; Oz inflation at 3.5%

Making money: How many microcaps should be in an investor's portfolio?

Bitcoin hits fresh record as instos pile into BTC ETFs – and Trump helps, too

There are more pages in this discussion • 241 more messages in this thread...

First 11 Last