rubbish. It is you who believes the words you use mean something other than their normal meaning.
Here it all is again
Now if you can tell me how I have misread something that’s down in black and white then I’m all ears. Or am I meant to assume you meant something other than what you said.
I make no claim that you don’t know what you wrote - but I do believe you think it means something other then the plain meaning
in law by the way that’s exactly what happens. It’s the plain meaning of what is written or said. Not what the person would like it to say or what it ought to say or what the other person ought to understand. so have a peek again
the original post
domestic violence is exacerbated by progressive judges and magistrates who continuously let offenders out on bail to reoffend.So many women have been killed by partners who were out on bail.
but you said it wasn’t the judges but the way the laws were geared
your exact words
I think the laws are geared that way, rather than judges being 'progressive'. but for sure the laws are skewed toward locking up children own remand and leaving violent perpetrators released to haunt their former partner, monitor and seek to control them and the kids.the number of murder suicides we've been reading about these last couple if years reflect quite an increase.imo the laws need to keep people safe. in this the laws don't seem to be working
I commented I thought you were wrong so back you come saying ffs I know that - haven’t you heard of empathy and active listening
indeed I have but if you are suggesting that your response to
@walbrook was either of those you clearly don’t understand them. - you didn’t empathise - you actually contradicted him in your opening sentence with that comment about the law. The original post had suggested it was judges. You twice suggest it is a problem with the law. How the hell is that empathy? And why did you say it if you knew it was wrong?
you very easily slip into personalised vitriol. and then accuse others of it.
