Since the announcement of the second stimulus package the following individuals and organisations have urged the parliament and therefore the opposition to pass the necessary legislation. Although I have been unable to find a record of their political donations and prejudices I think it would be safe to consider that most of them have a liberal bias.
Frank Lowry, Bill Wavis (Charman Meyer), Australian Chamber Commerce and Industry, Institute of Chartered Accountants who want it increased, Australian Trucking Industry, Housing Industry Association, Australian Industry Group, There may be more these were taken from Business Spectator over the period 4th to 7th of Feb 2009.
In addition the following are likely to gain from the second stimulus and could be reasonably considered to be upset if it does not occur, David Barro wealth $450 million, lew Buckridege wealth 1.55 Billion, Solomon Lew wealth 1 Billion, Bruce Mathieson wealth 1.1 Billion, Milner family 450 Million , Mick Power 400 million , John Symonds wealth 450 million. These names and figures were taken from business spectator 7 Feb 2009. It is reasonable to think that the majority of them would nt be happy if the Liberal Party stands between them and an increase in their wealth. It is therefore reasonable to think that as with the first group the majority of them would have a liberal bias.
Icannot see either group being in to big a hurry to put their hands in their pockets to fund the federal liberal party at the next election.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- is liberal funding at risk
Since the announcement of the second stimulus package the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
LU7
Discover the strong preliminary feasibility of the Bécancour Lithium Refinery, showcasing resilience in a low pricing environment and a strategic plan to capitalize on future price recoveries