is pm a fool???, page-6

regardless of where you are grouchoboy, you seem to have a fairly well oiled, concerted little attack going on here...

your posts barely hit the thread and they get a couple of "thumbs up" rather swiftly - given how late it is, and how little traffic on this thread there is, I am intrigued how your comments can muster such support so quickly...

surely you wouldn't be so amateurish as to have a couple of cronies standing by to click thumbs up for your work?

if so, I can only surmise that you and your cronies are trying to make out that your comments have some validity about them...

(I note that someone has since been in and voted the other way on your posts - and it wasn't me!)

as for your "undeniable facts" - some of those to the best of my knowledge aren't in the public domain because I haven't seen them previously, so either they are fabricated or perhaps a little more sinister?

in response to your questions, I doubt PM would need my protection, and further, I think to suggest that the new directors (JK, JA & NC), who are all very well qualified and respected, are some sort of puppets who will, as you put it " toe the line" is ludicrous to say the least!

as for my link to the Telegraph article, I think you may not have read it correctly, but don't worry, if necessary I'm sure your legal team will explain the case and the pertinent ramifications for you...