It is totally related to the Roame- they will argue that a substantial part of the Roame IP was a product of their funding and was vended into IOT without consent of or consideration for the plaintiffs. That has follow/on implications for both Kantor and IOT
It is totally related to the Roame- they will argue that a...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)