Moosey,
All this is hypothetical at the moment as we simply do not know what the economics of either of our theories are. Where you have stated:
“PRISM will be much cheaper to run in the end especially when you consider that the recovered Uranium from used nuclear fuel can be used again over and over in the existing LWR's”.
my theory is that it may be more cost effective (for the amount of energy produced) to build new PRISM reactors with new LWR than to only build PRISM reactors. Ultimately it will come down to what is more economically viable. As previously stated there are still many LWR under construction or planned to be built in the next 15 years. This at the very least suggests to me that my theory may offer a transitional arrangement for a few decades.
Thanks again for sharing your research, it is much appreciated.
I am the Iceman!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Is the US really serious about Climate Change?
Moosey, All this is hypothetical at the moment as we simply do...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SLX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$5.33 |
Change
0.260(5.13%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.262B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$5.12 | $5.33 | $5.01 | $4.811M | 914.2K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 336 | $5.29 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$5.34 | 1698 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 336 | 5.290 |
1 | 190 | 5.260 |
1 | 1698 | 5.250 |
2 | 1698 | 5.240 |
1 | 1698 | 5.230 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
5.340 | 1698 | 1 |
5.350 | 1698 | 1 |
5.360 | 1698 | 1 |
5.390 | 50000 | 1 |
5.500 | 368 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SLX (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online