Nabaru01,"The big one for me is the "correction" to tonnes...

Nabaru01,

"The big one for me is the "correction" to tonnes treated. My assumption was that for a trial such as this, a weightometer would be used for measuring the tonnage but it appears that this was not the case."

Big thumbs up from me for this post. I couldn't agree more.

I cannot believe we are just learning that the tonnage estimate was based on bucket counts and SG estimate. As you have rightly pointed out at the very least they should have been using a Loadrite.

" If the initial tonnage was correct, the grade was 12.7g/t). Was this just to compensate for the lower than expected GIC (226ozs Vs estimate of 1,000)? I wonder."

I wonder as well Nabaru. As stated in previous posts, IMO this again is either complete incompetence or it's misleading.

IMO, either these SG adjustments have been adjusted to make the grade look better or DH has again shown that he is out of his depth with respect to his mining related skillset.

I sure hope that our new board member has a higher mining related skillset than the current members.