“Go to page 7, and the very first word is "Uniqueness"
On pg. 13 they highlight "OEMs seeking disruptive technology", under the page heading of "key advantages".
Same document on pg. 6 shows a diagram of the FRG unit. Despite some here stating the unit wouldn't create ozone, the company itself clearly states "Ambient air creates Ozone (O3) ; Moist air creates Hydroxyl (OH) radicals". (right hand side of page).
Nobody said it wouldn’t create OZONE, it was said that OZONE would not be released into the air. Here is a line from the Patent. You can also ask the company for the patent if you want a good read!
"The free radical generator optionally includes a filter through which the treated air from the discharge space is filtered. The filter optionally absorbs the by products of the complex chemical reactions occurring in the discharge space. For example, due to the presence of oxygen usually ozone forms in the discharge space. Although a low level of ozone in the treated air can be beneficial in decontaminating the surface, the filter optionally destroys ozone."
Sorry the company didn’t spell out to you the exact process and highlight every part of the device with number and it being itemised. If they did you say they have confused people with too much scientific information! The company was probably asked about Ozone being released into the air so they made it clear again, NO harmful emissions! So stop your rubbish posting!
Go to page 8, 'Operational modes'.. It clearly states and shows.. 'ambient air with airborne microbes and particles' entering the FGR unit on the left and on the right "Clean air" and below that "Mix of radicals for room sterilization".
There is no sign nor mention of any 'neutralizer' anywhere on either the diagrams on pg 6 nor pg 8, nor in the written description
So yes lets go through it so it’s clear to you. You can have it without the filter, create ozone and use for water. They know that there are already these devices but they are expensive to use and run. There is an Olympic Australian swimmer in Hong Kong who trains kids in a pool that runs ozone, and very little chlorine, but it costs a bundle to run. PO3 are saying they can disrupt the market because it’s more efficient and cheaper to run and install etc etc etc.! So again, not Unique in this respect but disruptive for the ability do it better, and cheaper. DISRUPT THE MARKET!!!!!!
There is no mention of any 'neutralizer' in any company announcements that I've seen prior to 2020. If any exist please give a link. Here is the original patent again for you, well before 2020!
"The free radical generator optionally includes a filter through which the treated air from the discharge space is filtered. The filter optionally absorbs the by products of the complex chemical reactions occurring in the discharge space. For example, due to the presence of oxygen usually ozone forms in the discharge space. Although a low level of ozone in the treated air can be beneficial in decontaminating the surface, the filter optionally destroys ozone."
Easing the mind of shareholders?? That is ridiculous, the diagram from pg 8 in the document linked above, clearly gives the impression that the air coming out of the unit is cleaned, the term "Clean Air" is used, no neutralizer and no mention of needing one, no mention of 'harmful gasses' coming out of the unit either.
Yes because they likely had many calls from shareholders reading your rubbish! So they made it clearer for people, now you say it’s NEW????
