Is this a case of sell the fact or something else, page-32

Thank you Stickshift for confirming.
i resented when the critics of this company pointed it out, that the Chinese are not going to work for AVZ to be in charge of the Manono deposit.

AVZ did seek a Sovereign Guarantee, later a Colloboration Agreement. All these desires point to heavy reliance to take it a step further and the Chinese must have known this all along.

CATH seems to believe it can be done, but to do it they took cheap shares @ 4.5cps now 30% in Manono Lithium (Dathcom)

This is why 2018 matters to understand AVZ was attempting the flight of an Icarus. It was only meant to sell timed within CATL IPO listing May 2018, IMO. Disaster struck and why Klaus’ dump was anger as well - he was made to look the fool is not his cup of tea after telling Bloomberg the phone keeps ringing. AVZ had an aggressive mining timeline by 2020 (AGM 2017 preso) — I didn’t appreciate what more seasoned commenters were saying on this. Like many, I simply believed especially when he talks it up with premining finance. Ninja was desperate to say the least to find funds to boost AVZ.

Klaus left in October as consultant tells us what, about how important Klaus is for AVZ in Congo. I don’t think we had a French speaker in AVZ Perth office after Klaus left and up until Serge arrived.

When AXINO revealed that Exit Strategies is a conference point for AVZ, AVZ hadn’t told its much more cynical Anglophone members the same point.
We heard Nigel at a Perth pub conference confess he contradicts what engineers tell him on construction phase timeline, 18 versus 24 months. What does this say about this exploration geologist given the executive position which was never really meant to happen but happened despite not fitting Klaus’ shoes?

Having said that, AVZ may well get a decent price Anything over 50cps is amazing IMO