is this going to help EDE at last?, page-44

First 44 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Frank64

376 Posts.

56

15/05/23

14:34

Post #: 67779465
Share

Originally posted by rolling: ↑

Hi newbie,

Here is a link to the 28 day trial results from a multi national. You will note that results were not uniform. The multi national didn’t progress their trial beyond 28 days.

https://www2.asx.com.au/markets/trade-our-cash-market/todays-announcements

So that announcement should confirm to you that results aren’t consistent/uniform.

If that isn’t enough proof, research the Texas precast trials. And the Korea precast trials.

EDE gave its most accurate disclosure ever when it stated that the results, as per the above link, weren’t uniform. And we know cost is a big issue too.

So when a specified strength is paramount, uniform strength strength is paramount. If EdenCrete doesn’t guarantee uniform strength, how can a contractor, engineer, architect, specify it?

EDE has stated that failure occurs at the aggregate, not the nanotube. This, as well as variation in dispersion, is why there aren’t uniform results. Aggregate sourced from different locations varies in its strength properties.

Expand

Not a newbie by the way,

Can not find any of your negative claims any where from independent third parties reporting in a negative or non beneficial use of Edencrete. A search of any third party reports relating to Texas or Korea precast trials comes up with zero. Your 28day trial result from a multi national link does not work.

"EDE has stated that failure occurs at the aggregate, not the nanotube" your words above. Correct to a certain degree but maybe you mean from the explanation in the image below that the integrity of the aggregate is compromised and fractures due to becoming the weaker element with the addition of edencrete.

EDE Price at posting: 0.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
6 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply