here is not soluble so the existing water contains zero...

here is not soluble so the existing water contains zero dissolved thorium
But it is subject to silt movement in dredging and it it also radioactive causing toxicity issues and not something you want to pump into the ocean surely?
Thorium was my lessor concern...is there anything else you can think of thats
1) one of the poisonous minerals in the game
2) soluble
3) well known to be a concern and you have said so before
4) found in high levels
Anything there too? I just want to ask these questions to see what you will bring up about your mine before I take a better look.
Because investors may need to know about this wouldnt you think?

you are trying to kill another greenland and/or REE project whats that 5 or 6 times i seen you try this tactic
Wow. Big call. Simple answer to it.
Show me one.
Just one? One other REE mine out of all these others (which if anyone checks there isnt anywhere near this many in Greenland anyway)
If you cant....what would that be saying about you?

the mine operated from 1850 to 1990 when was one of the worlds most profitable and that was before there were markets for silica and REE
So you are comparing cryolite as a metal additive during the war to REEs that you walked away from and didnt add to your REE mines stockpikes?
Is this another crack I see perhaps.

as for your comment that 3 others have walked away wow again what a load of mis leading again
ANother poster shared this report and background showing it not me. It was in writing Im suprised it is when you say otherwise. I dont know which to believe now. Probably a report.

all projects go through periods where groups look at them and walk
Doesnt that sound like an immediate backflip from what you just offered? It sounds now like they did.

Yow seem to have missed all those questions above gbb
Why do u keep missing them?
Should I ask makvaerk?