You will notice that there are a few things that may give us a...

You will notice that there are a few things that may give us a clue here, namely these bits,

advances in rifle design and be able to handle """improved ammunition."""

and this :- (take note CJ)

"Critics have also raised concerns about the range and lethality of the 5.56 mm cartridge of the M16/M4."

and the reference to a gas operated piston weapon being more reliable than the M16 or M4 (SLR is such an animal, gas operated piston)




Army Sets Sights on New Rifle
* U.S. NEWS
* FEBRUARY 2, 2011

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704124504576118550237336920.html?mod=WSJ_article_LatestHeadlines

By NATHAN HODGE

For the first time in almost 50 years, the U.S. Army wants to replace the standard rifle shouldered by hundreds of thousands of frontline troops around the world.

The service this week advertised its interest in a new weapon that would incorporate futuristic sights and other advances in rifle design and be able to handle improved ammunition.

The gun would potentially supplant the M4 carbine, a shorter-barrel version of the M16, the Army's main infantry weapon for decades.

View Full Image
ARMYGUN
US Army

A soldier with an XM25 weapon system, an advanced grenade launcher being tested by the Army.
ARMYGUN
ARMYGUN

Operations in Afghanistan?where troops often engage the enemy over long distances?have rekindled debate over the quality of the Army's standard-issue rifles and their reliability in dusty, primitive conditions. An Army report on a 2008 battle in Wanat, Afghanistan, cited soldier complaints about jamming and overheating M4s, in particular. Nine servicemen died in that fight.

Critics have also raised concerns about the range and lethality of the 5.56 mm cartridge of the M16/M4.

Col. Doug Tamilio, the service's project manager for soldier weapons, said in a statement the Army sought to find "the most effective, accurate, and reliable" weapon for its soldiers. "We're challenging industry to develop the next-generation carbine and we're looking forward to the results."

An "industry day" for small-arms manufacturers is planned for March 30. The Army said it would pick a winner after two years of rigorous evaluation. Gerald Dinkel, the president and CEO of Colt Defense LLC, said the Army has "held out the M4 as a high standard, and somebody is going have to come out and really beat it."

The M16, made by both Colt and FN Manufacturing LLC, a unit of FN Herstal SA of Belgium, along with the M4, have long enjoyed the loyalty of Army leaders who say the weapons are "combat proven." The M4 has slightly less range than the M16, but is easier to handle, particularly in urban combat.

View Full Image
ARMYGUN_2
Alamy

The M1 Garand entered service in the 1930s. The .30-calibre rifle weighed about 10 pounds and had a range of around 500 meters.
ARMYGUN_2
ARMYGUN_2

View Full Image
ARMYGUN_3
Colt

The M16 Rifle entered service in the 1960s. The 5.56-mm rifle weighed about 8.8 pounds and had a range of approximately 550-800 meters.
ARMYGUN_3
ARMYGUN_3

View Full Image
ARMYGUN_4
Colt

The M4 Carbine entered service in the 1990s. The 5.56-mm rifle weighs about 7.5 pounds and has a range of 500-600 meters.
ARMYGUN_4
ARMYGUN_4

But Army commanders have also long faced questions about the rifles' design: Both are built around a gas-operated system that cuts down on moving parts, but requires consistent cleaning.

Experts have often noted that the M16/M4 also fares poorly in terms of ruggedness and reliability compared with Soviet-designed Kalashnikov assault rifles, which are a favorite weapon of insurgents around the world.

In 2007, the M4 fared worse than three other weapons?the Heckler & Koch HK416, the FN Herstal Mk16 Special Operations Combat Assault Rifle and the Heckler & Koch XM8?in comparative reliability testing conducted by the Army.

The current M16 and M4 in many respects bear little resemblance to Vietnam-era antecedents: They are usually have advanced optics, and can be fitted with accessories such as flashlights. But critics on Capitol Hill, including Sen. Tom Coburn (R., Okla.), have in the past questioned why the service chose to stick with upgrades instead of seeking a replacement.

In Afghanistan, the Army has introduced the M14 Enhanced Battle Rifle, an upgraded version of the M14 rifle, which is chambered for a full-power rifle round that has a longer effective range than the M4 or M16. The Army is also experimenting with more futuristic infantry weapons in Afghanistan.

In parallel with the contest for a new rifles, the Army is considering additional improvements to the M4, including ambidextrous controls. The Army may also study alternatives to the rifle's gas operating system, according to an official fact sheet.

Last year, the service began field trials of the XM25 Counter Defilade Target Engagement System, an advanced grenade launcher equipped with a laser range finder and onboard computer.

It fires a programmable 25mm round that is designed to go off just above?or just behind ? its target. The concept is to create a lethal weapon that can hit enemies behind cover.

James Carafano, a retired Army officer who is a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, predicted in a recent interview that more of these weapons would soon be in the hands of the individual soldier.

"Precision weaponry is going to get really personal," Mr. Carafano said. "You're eventually going to see an individual soldier dropping a round down a chimney."

Write to Nathan Hodge at [email protected]


and this

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/the-usas-m4-carbine-controversy-03289/

Jan 31/11: The US Army issues Draft RFP W15QKN-11-R-F003 for an ?Individual Carbine.? In practice, the solicitation announces an Industry Day on March 30/11, and offerors are directed to NOT submit proposals at this time. Interested parties are advised that only firms within the Small Arms Industry will be granted admittance at the Doubletree Hotel Washington DC ? Crystal City, and that ITAR export control procedures are in effect.

Col. Doug Tamilio, the service?s project manager for soldier weapons, reportedly said in a statement that ?We?re challenging industry to develop the next-generation carbine and we?re looking forward to the results.? On the other hand, there have been previous industry days (vid. 2008), and other next-generation carbines have been shelved in the past, on the nebulous ground of not being enough of an improvement over the M4.


Note the bit about reliability and how the gas operated piston method seems superior to other gas only systems!

FN-SCAR all use gas-piston operating systems to achieve automatic fire.

?The gas piston system in the H&K 416 is not a new system. Rifles were being designed with these systems in the 1920?s. Colt proposed a piston operated weapon to the Army in the early 1960?s. Today Colt Defense has the ability and expertise to manufacture in great numbers piston system carbines of exceptional quality should the U.S. military services initiate a combat requirement for this type of weapon?


So it wouls eem that the US may be going for a larger caliber and a weapon that uses a gas operated piston, remember the SLR? it may not mean that the US will use a weapon made or even designed in Oz, it may just mean that the Oz Military are just going to make their own versions for themselves?