No, I thought he meant AVQ was seeking damages from the court which he didnt mean, as I thought the court didnt know who were the rightful landowner after the CoA it went back to re-tender and due to this decision from CoA, it voided SMM having to pay the $5M initially award to AVQ?
As for the drilling of the tenement, I need to look at their maiden JORC announcement in Sept last year again.
Isabel soon , increase to off take deals soon, page-66
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)