You can fool the gullible like Irjones, but most of your "evidence" is fallacious and you know it but you still use it.
That tired old argument about Israel being just 1% of the land mass and there are no distinct Palestinians only has any relevance if you postulate that Palestinians put a counter-claim to Palestine to the one the jews put. Then you debunk the imaginary counter-claim by discrediting the title and ownership and statehood of Palestine. That is a wicked cynical argument Snooker.
But the fact is, there were people living there, they don't just "move over" so jews can be settled - that was their home.
