I have a few basic question from your opinion bearing in mind I look at action instead of lip service. Oz voted against the banning of Nazism. So have all G7-1 + hangerons including passive abstensions.
And now for the second UN resolution on humanitarian assistance for Gaza.
Yes very surprising Russia abstained. But bear in mind they initiated the first resolution vote that was rejected.
Action speaks louder than words. It is immaterial if Canberra PM "does not support" or "support", it does so based on national interests. Do you think the current crop of PM are like the past, much more independent thinking ones? Compare these "yes men" to Paul Keating and you see why Canberra Foreign Dept is just a branch office. Washington decides and we have no choice but to follow suit.
Not much peep squeak coming out of the bastion of democracy, human rights & freedoms on the civilians murdered daily/hourly but just to gold plate the hypocrisy you can eat your heart out on this.
Depending who you believe, Palestinians deliberately bombed their hospital, missile misfire, missile launch nearby from the graveyard right through to Bibi's rep Naftali publishing then deleting a tweet, Anglican church told to vacate warning, Mossad recorded conversations, video tape of the fighter jet flares, type of bombs used (JDAM) or mid air explosive bomb. There is a reason for the entire spectrum of biases.
