Share
1,334 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 344
clock Created with Sketch.
24/09/21
12:30
Share
Originally posted by gregbris:
↑
sorry - it wasn't explained well, as I was going for brevity. from higher up on this thread - from one of bob's accounts I think, they quoted something about it isx leaves Australia then ASX and co won't have control over them... basically. this sort of implied overseas they don't have regulators. European AML rules are tighter than ours (which were slackened from memory). ISX has been provided compliance with brexit transactions- yet here we are unable to reap the rewards of owning part of this company. as per court documents - companies don't want to sign up with ISX as the court case and suspension is a contentious issue. to me - AFR has had a target on JK's back for a long time - ever since ISX started gaining some great growth. Showing no concern for the shareholders whatsoever, allowing ASX to hide behind a moral cloak. I've missed a few points for sure but I hope this covers most of your query. AFR could have published ASX turning down escrow negotiations- Fairfax could have been balanced in research - but to me never have.
Expand
things started to go south just after that interview with Alan Koehler when JK said something like the fish are jumping in to the boat. That must have caught a few peoples attention to the company.