ISX CEO - JOHN KARANTZIS v FAIRFAX MEDIA PUBLICATIONS (Mr Joe Aston), page-703

I don’t think there is any debate on who set the scope at all. Why do think there was a supplementary IE report, because ASX wanted VISA correspondence examined (thats actually stated in letters between the two parties). There is no way ASX would have released those reports through the MAP if they thought they had missed the scope, they certainly didn’t feel the need to release ISX’s response to the Statement of Reasons. Ken Lewis was riding ISX like a horse, asking question after question and releasing detailed correspondence through the MAP, yet some people want to believe this guy (who publicly approved the independent experts appointments) was all of a sudden hoodwinked by ISX on the report scope. Honestly spare me, and some people think supporters like ridiculous conspiracy theories. I also come back to where have ASX ever publicly said the IE reports missed the scope or made those accusations? As far as I can see they’ve just tried to pretend the reports never happened.