No offence but this is no different than the noise you're...

No offence but this is no different than the noise you're talking about. The above example is full of assumptions, conflation and an overly simplistic set of ideas. You assume that investors are not looking at forward revenue at relevant multiples and are merely investing on momentum and fomo. The SP probably got a little ahead of itself but, in my opinion, not so much that it should affect long term holders in the long run. The real sharks in this pool and their helpers should be obvious to most.

I would suggest that investors be very wary of "wise" advice on these forums, wether it be positive or negative (including my own of course!). There is an abundance of duplicity across these threads and at the end of the day you have to trust yourself and your own research.