. Hi @ChillingOut "Regrettably, a large amount of time and money...

.

Hi @ChillingOut

"Regrettably, a large amount of time and money has been spent arguing over subpoenae issued by the Defendants on ASX and Visa."


Imo, No regrets by isx over the subpoena issues with ASX and Visa. The information gained was a good investment, and will be utilized in the trial starting 27/2 to strengthen isx's case no doubt.


To bring you up to speed, on these statements in your post.

"The Visa subpoena issue and the claim for privilege is scheduled to be determined Friday, 24 Feb"


Visa's privilege hearing has already been completed. Both parties worked a deal on the 6-10-22 - See orders

The interlocutory hearing next Fri 24/2 is a costs hearing - See order

https://comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P/VID773/2020/3904609/event/31202153/document/2010035





"The former was abandoned with the Defendants who were ordered to pay $150K for the process"

Wrong - Not abandoned


"The parties have agreed to compromise the Privilege Challenge List dispute, and the Defendants have agreed not to make further challenges to ASX’s claims of privilege or otherwise to ASX’s compliance with the ASX Subpoena."

https://comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P/VID773/2020/3904609/event/31202155/document/2017367



There was an initial order of 150k subpoena costs payment to be paid to the asx.

That 150k payment became part of the asx v isx proceedings to be vacated orders on the 2-11-22

"All previous orders as to costs in this proceeding be vacated" - See orders


https://comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P/VID1315/2019/3877197/event/31231680/document/2021724


.