sorry I made an error yes it was the ASX, I hope you can forgive...

sorry I made an error yes it was the ASX, I hope you can forgive a typo?

had the management not sort to reward themselves with performance shares in the way they did there would be no question of integrity.

I'm not going to comment on the role media played in this, as the Australian media is not the fourth estate seeking truth. but if there wasn't any issues related the conduct of management there would be very little fuel for media attacks.

if there was not any concerns related to conduct of management, there would little or no need for the regulator to seek any action.

this is no a paradox by any stretch, the management did "something", that "something" did not agree with the exchange, and that "something" seems to have raised concerns by the regulator. therefore management should held accountable for whatever that "something" is, as none of it occurred in a vacuum.