Share
195 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 118
clock Created with Sketch.
15/11/21
19:52
Share
Originally posted by naomhan:
↑
So, it's not that no one will answer your questions. It's that no one important will answer your questions. I'm absolutely unimportant in the ISX debacle - no debate required. Unfortunately, so are you, which is why ASIC's chair won't respond to your queries. A bit rough being cranky at that. Thanks for responding to my question. Can I ask what your concerns are about (ISX) management's handling of the situations? As I've said, I have queries for ASX around the scattergun approach to the early letters. I have queries for ASX around why the Clayton Utz letters, and the changes there. I haven't got acceptable answers from ASX for them (admittedly, I've never asked, and even if I did, ASX couldn't respond due to privacy reasons). I have a lot more questions for ISX directors, and have been unimpressed at their responses to date. Agree to disagree on the "no evidence" thing. I can see plenty.
Expand
These ISX holders who have JK's back can't be reasoned with.... Let them continue to think that JK, NSX, flykk anything ISX related is awesome and that ASIC, ASX, ATO, ACCC, AICD,VISA etc are out to get them.