Hi
@naomhan,
You guys are truly amazing! What is wrong with you all! I respond to a post in which you accuse me of not knowing what beneficial ownership is. In that post, I do not say anything about JK's holdings in BVI. I do say there are many other reasons to have money in BVI than tax avoidance. You are confused. Go check!
And while I am at it, I want to remind you (and other criticisers), the original reason for all the hoopla the group of you are going on about is that I posted what happened on Friday in the court. It was a day that ISX was in reply, so of course, the day was biased towards ISX - so accordingly my reporting on it. Do you really think that HWL would get up and point out anything else? It was in
reply, for God's sake, to accusations and assumptions by ATO!
Chilling out followed with what he said was going to be a balanced report about Friday's session (hint. Mine wasn't). Considering that there
was no balance in Friday's session, that pricked up my interest. And what he said was said (to provide that missing balance and to prove he was the only balanced person in the room) simply was not said. I pointed this out and advised people that they really needed to reassess the trust they put in Chilling out's posts." And I stand by that. Anyone who wants to can get the transcript can check and confirm. I was not making things up. I was setting things straight and I do question his motive for making things up.
That said, there is some value in some of ChillingOut's posts.
I get it. ISX shareholders have been amazingly tight throughout this saga. In no AGM has any shareholder shown anger toward JK or the other directors. A large majority has been unified on every major vote. This must really irk you all. Also, to be attacked like I am, I must somehow be a threat to anti-ISX'ers strange reality.
.
And just to set the record straight (this is what a rant really is!): I have not been "greatly embarrassed" by being "admonished" by ChillingOut, as ChillingOut says (ok Daddy...),or chagrin (distress of mind caused by humiliation, disappointment, or failure) by his having " to
call you(me) out several times much to your (my) chagrin - or his claims that I am overexuberant - you name it (and he is upset that I criticise the great him?).
This is the only rant I will provide to the copious critical posts by you anti-ISXers. Just because I don't respond, do not think it is for any of the reasons stated by ChillingOut. I just cannot be bothered because it is bound to generate all sorts of worthless posts such as, I predict, will be generated by this one. You guys just don't give up with your anti-propaganda and people are just plain sick of it.
And I also get, by his own account (several times - as if we didn't understand him the first time) ChillingOut is some great lawyer and we should all bow down and NEVER EVER question him or his motives. Or think for ourselves.
Lastly, while I am at it, no-one is forced to read any of my posts. I frequently encourage people to question them and check on their accuracy. I also state my bias which is more than the anti-ISX posters do.
