Sorry to repeat a question - but does anyone understand the level of evidence required for a Judge to grant/deny discovery?
This is an important question to test the validity of some of the conspiracy theories being thrown about in the forums. If the Justice is simply permitting a fishing expedition the value is a lot less than if a certain evidentiary hurdle is required to allow discovery. Just interested to know.
Anyone?
ISX vs ASX, page-686
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,208 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)