The problem with shareholders voting at an AGM or EGM is that...

The problem with shareholders voting at an AGM or EGM is that the individual believes that their shareholding won't change the result, because institutions will outweigh them.

We have to convince the smaller shareholders that, in this case, their votes will count (or at least those that want to overthrow the Ancien regime on Bastille Day!!).

Contacting the press about the current situation should help, but what else can we do? How much Institutional holdings are there? Are they tied to the current management? Does Klaas have any influence in that direction?

Can we get an estimate of votes for and against change in some way? It probably shouldn't be done on a public forum like this, but how about sent to an e-mail address. It could enable Klaas et al breathe easier.

Cheers

R