its ok to stay positive, page-20

Arafura, Justice Mariana is now considering the arguments from both sides as to whether there is a significant danger to the public and environment in letting the LAMP operate while the judicial review is in progress.

Do you think SMSL would have been able to prove there is a significant danger at the last hearing? Concentrate is < 1Bg/g so it pretty much makes it impossible. Other concerns like air/water/soil pollution have been addressed with AELB data and independent monitoring.

I think Lynas would have been given the benefit of the doubt considering the scientific evidence and approvals given by IAEA and AELB.

I think the costs of delays to Lynas by being penalized with a suspension gives further weight to letting them operate.

Remember the whole point of the TEMPORARY OPERATING LICENSE is to give Lynas the opportunity to prove the LAMP is safe and can commercialize all the waste.