There is no necessary direct link or rule of thumb association between EBITDA and NPAT - a company that has achieved EBITDA positive may not necessarily have a profit if it has a high level of debt or capital intensive or both - being EBITDA positive is generally closer to assume positive operating cashflow than is to profit, but for ********* tech companies that do not capitalise their R&D expenses (hence no amortisation) and do not have loans (most of the microcaps don't ) being EBITDA positive is rather close to being positive NPAT even 1:1. You could check the company annual report to determine the ratio applicable to the company s circumstance
- Forums
- ASX - General
- Its Over
Its Over, page-1190
- There are more pages in this discussion • 20,526 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
HAR
HARANGA RESOURCES LIMITED.
Peter Batten, MD
Peter Batten
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online