...the Reps were crying out lack of evidence to support the...

  1. 20,515 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1957
    ...the Reps were crying out lack of evidence to support the impeachment of Trump..now they seem to have forgotten the importance of evidence when they try to press their narrative of voter fraud.
    ...the Reps (Lindsay Graham) also said during Obama's tenure that appointment of a supreme court judge should not be made during a time leading up to an election... but they did exactly that fast tracking Amy Barrett's appointment

    I have never seen a time in politics that what you say does not apply to yourself but only to the other side. This "I have the right to be wrong but you don't" politics has absolutely no credibility.


    Column 1
    0 BREAKING NEWS
    1 A federal judge dismissed President Trump’s last major legal bid to delay Pennsylvania’s vote certification, saying it was “unsupported by evidence.”
    2 Saturday, November 21, 2020 8:00 PM EST
    3 In a scathing order, Judge Matthew W. Brann wrote that President Trump’s campaign, which had asked him to effectively disenfranchise nearly seven million voters, should have come to court “armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption” in its efforts to essentially nullify the results of Pennsylvania’s election.
    But instead, Judge Brann complained, the Trump campaign provided only “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations” that were “unsupported by evidence.”
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.