...in the absence of 10yr bond yield doing a dramatic spike in spite of inflationary concerns going forwards, the downdraft on Gold is perplexing but nonetheless cements my view that an All-In position in gold equities remains premature. Yet, rather than chasing tails when Gold bids higher, it is IMO appropriate to stay the course on Gold but in measured terms and for those with little or no exposure, it may well be a good bargain hunting opportunity to toe dip (measuredly of course) over the coming week.
Yet again, to emphasise that Gold microcaps fortunes are based on forward gold prices so in that sense, any weakness thereof is a mere reflection of herd action, but one has to buy gold microcaps for the right reason - and the one and only compelling reason is DISCOVERY in big caps. No amount of higher gold price can save a junior gold microcap from prospering if discovery yields no results- that is all that matters really.
Gold: The Fed Wrought Havoc On Precious Metals
By Przemyslaw Radomski of Sunshine Profits
Friday, June 18, 2021 12:10 PM EDT
Gold declined on Thursday, or I should say, gold rushed down at breakneck speed. And while it might have been a surprise for some, it wasn’t for me. However, we should stay alert to any possible changes, as no market moves in a straight line. Tread carefully.
On a side note, while I didn’t check it myself (it’s impossible to read every article out there), based on the correspondence I've received, it appears I’ve been one of the only authors to actually be bearish on gold before the start of this week.
Please keep that in mind, along with me saying that yesterday’s decline is just the beginning, even though a short-term correction might start soon. Having that in mind, let’s discuss what the Fed did (and what it didn’t do) in greater detail. Look At What You Did
With the U.S. Federal Reserve’s reverse-repo nightmare frightening the liquidity out of the system, I highlighted on June 17 that the Fed raised the interest rate on excess reserves (IOER) from 0.10% to 0.15%.
I wrote: "The Fed hopes that by offering a higher interest rate it will deter counterparties from participating in the reverse repo transactions. However, whether it will or whether it won’t is not important. The headline is that the Fed is draining liquidity from the system, and increasing the IOER is another sign that the U.S. federal funds rate could soon seek higher ground.
"Please see below: "To explain, the red line above tracks the U.S. federal funds rate, while the green line above tracks the IOER. If you analyze the behavior, you can see that the two have a rather close connection. And while we don’t expect the Fed to raise interest rates anytime soon, officials’ words, actions, and the macroeconomic data signal that the taper is likely coming in September."
And in an ironic twist, while the question of whether it will or whether it won’t seemed reasonable at the time, the tsunami of reverse repurchase agreements on June 17 signal that 0.15% just isn’t going to cut it.
Case in point: while the Fed hoped that the five-basis-point olive branch would calm institutions’ nerves, a record $756 billion in excess liquidity was shipped to the Fed on June 17. For context, it was nearly $235 billion more than the daily amount recorded on June 16. Please see below:
To explain the significance, I wrote previously: "A reverse repurchase agreement (repo) occurs when an institution offloads cash to the Fed in exchange for a Treasury security (on an overnight or short-term basis). And with U.S. financial institutions currently flooded with excess liquidity, they’re shipping cash to the Fed at an alarming rate.
"The green line above tracks the daily reverse repo transactions executed by the Fed, while the red line above tracks the U.S. federal funds rate. Moreover,notice what happened the last time reverse repos moved above 400 billion?
"If you focus your attention on the red line, you can see that after the $400 billion level was breached in December 2015, the Fed’s rate-hike cycle began. Thus, with current inflation dwarfing 2015 levels and U.S. banks practically throwing cash at the Fed, is this time really different?"
Furthermore, I noted on June 17 that the Fed’s latest ‘dot plot’ was a hawkish shift that market participants were not expecting. I wrote: "The perceived probability of a rate hike by the end of 2022 sunk to a 2021 low on June 12. However, after the Fed’s material about-face on June 16, I’m sure these positions have been recalibrated.
"Please see below:
And as if the chart above had been inverted, the perceived probability of a rate hike by the end of 2022 has now surged to more than 90%. The Death Toll of June 17
In addition, while I’ve been warning for months that the bond market’s fury would eventually upend the PMs, not only has the Fed’s inflationary misstep rattled the financial markets, but the U.S. 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) jumped to 3.25% on June 17. Please see below: Source: Mortgage News Daily
Furthermore, please read what Matthew Graham, COO of Mortgage News Daily, had to say:
“Markets were somewhat surprised by the Fed's rate hike outlook. Granted, the Fed Funds Rate (the thing the Fed would actually be hiking) doesn't control mortgage rates, but the outlook speaks to how quickly the Fed would need to dial back its bond buying programs (a.k.a 'tapering'). Those programs definitely help keep rates low. The sooner the Fed begins tapering, the sooner mortgage rates will see some upward pressure.”
To that point, with tapering prophecies officially morphing from the minority into the consensus, the PMs weren’t the only commodities sent to slaughter on June 17. For example, the S&P Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (S&P GSCI) plunged by 2.37% as the inflationary unwind spread. For context, the S&P GSCI contains 24 commodities from all sectors: six energy products, five industrial metals, eight agricultural products, three livestock products, and two precious metals.
Exacerbating the selling pressure, China’s National Food and Strategic Reserves Administration announced on June 17 that it would release its copper, aluminum, and zinc supplies “in the near future” in a bid to contain the inflationary surge that’s plaguing the region. As a result, if the psychological forces that led to the surge in cost-push inflation come undone, the USD Index could move from the outhouse to the penthouse.
To explain, I wrote on April 27: "Why is the behavior of the S&P GSCI so important? Well, if you analyze the chart below, you can see that the S&P GSCI’s pain is often the USD Index’s gain. "To explain, the red line above tracks the USD Index, while the green line above tracks theinvertedS&P GSCI. For context, inverted means that the S&P GSCI’s scale is flipped upside down and that a rising green line represents a falling S&P GSCI, while a falling green line represents a rising S&P GSCI. More importantly, though, since 2010, it’s been a near splitting image." Inflation Is Still There
In the meantime, though, inflationary pressures are far from contained. And while the S&P GSCI’s plight would be a boon for the USD Index, the greenback still has plenty of other bullets in its chamber. Case in point: with the Fed poised to taper in September and investors underpricing the relative outperformance of the U.S. economy, VANDA Research’s latest FX Outlook signals that over-optimism abroad could lead to a material re-rating over the summer.
Please see below:
To explain, the chart on the right depicts investors’ expectations of economic strength across various regions. If you analyze the second (CAD) and the third (GBP) bars from the right, you can see that positioning is more optimistic than the economic growth that’s likely to materialize. Conversely, if you analyze the first bar (USD) from the left, you can see that positioning is more pessimistic than the economic growth that’s likely to materialize.
As a result, with U.S. GDP growth poised to outperform the U.K., Canada, and the Eurozone, an upward re-rating of the USD Index could intensify the PMs selling pressure over the medium-term.
On top of that, while the inflation story is far from over (and will pressure the Fed to taper in September), the Philadelphia Fed released its Manufacturing Business Outlook Survey on June 17. And while manufacturing activity dipped in June, “the diffusion index for future general activity increased 17 points from its May reading, reaching 69.2, its highest level in nearly 30 years.”
In addition, “the employment index increased 11 points, recovering its losses from last month,” and “the future employment index rose 2 points... [as] over 59% of the firms expect to increase employment in their manufacturing plants over the next six months, compared with only 5% that anticipates employment declines.”
For context, employment is extremely important because a strengthening U.S. labor market will likely put the final nail in QE’s coffin. But saving the best for last:
“The prices paid diffusion index rose for the second consecutive month, 4 points to 80.7, its highest reading since June 1979. The percentage of firms reporting increases in input prices (82 percent) was higher than the percentage reporting decreases (1 percent). The current prices received index rose for the fourth consecutive month, moving up 9 points to 49.7, its highest reading since October 1980.”
Please see below: Source: Philadelphia Fed Investment Clock Is Ticking
Also, signaling that QE is living on borrowed time, Bank of America’s ‘Investment Clock’ is ticking toward a bear flattener in the second half of 2021. For context, the term implies that short-term interest rates will rise at a faster pace than long-term interest rates and result in a ‘flattening’ of the U.S. yield curve. Please see below:
To explain, the circular reference above depicts the appropriate positioning during various stages of the economic cycle. If you focus your attention on the red box, you can see that BofA forecasts higher interest rates and lower earnings per share (EPS) for S&P 500 companies during the back half of the year.
As further evidence, not only is the Fed’s faucet likely to creak in the coming months, but fiscal stimulus may be nearing the dry season as well. Please see below:
To explain, the blue bars above track the U.S. budget deficit as a percentage of the GDP. If you analyze the red circle on the right side of the chart, you can see that coronavirus-induced spending was only superseded by World War II. Moreover, with the law of gravity implying that ‘what goes up must come down,’ the forthcoming infrastructure package could be investors’ final fiscal withdrawal. The Housing Market
Last but not least, while the S&P 500 has remained relatively upbeat in recent days, weakness in the U.S. housing market could shift the narrative over the medium-term. Please see below:
To explain, the red line above tracks the S&P 500, while the green line above tracks U.S. private building permits (released on June 16). If you analyze the arrows, you can see that the former nearly always rolls over in advance of the latter.
For context, the S&P 500 initially peaked before building permits in 2018 and alongside in 2015. However, in 2018, when the S&P 500 recovered and continued its ascent – while building permits did not – the U.S. equity benchmark suffered a roughly 20% drawdown.
Thus, if you analyze the right side of the chart, you can see that building permits peaked in January and have declined significantly. And if history is any indication, the S&P 500 will eventually follow suit.
In conclusion, the PMs imploded on June 17, as taper trepidation and the USD Index’s sharp re-rating dropped the guillotine on the metals. And with the Fed’s latest ‘dot plot’ akin to bullet holes in the PMs, the walking wounded are still far from a recovery.
With inflation surging and the Fed likely to become even more hawkish in the coming months, the cycle has materially shifted from the 'Goldilocks' environment that the metals once enjoyed. And with the two-day price action likely the opening act of a much larger play, the PMs could be waiting months for another round of applause.
