If efed's premise that his interpretation of facts was lacking, he would engage in trying to resolve the discrepancy. But instead he insists on repeating the same misunderstood data as though it stands on its own as evidence of his position.
If he was speaking truth, he would engage in resolving this discrepancy. But like Menta before him, he could easily just be a bot, programmed to repeat cut and paste information after mining our posts for keywords.
ergo the circumstantial evidence is that he is a liar.
