If you are talking of the clip that heads this thread
The story as told by the lady who did the original test was that her job in the laboratory was to get a virus sample and bombard it with various chemicals and just continue to bombard until the virus dies
Well she had to put a large amount on it to kill it so that was the end of the test, so as a test of a medical product it is nothing but a starting point and the story goes on that they did not do anymore, this was just a quick invitro test and certainly can't be used to qualify a drug which is already in use
Therefore the story linked is just a cheap trick to throw mud at a cure which would if proven effective would kill the use of the current vaccinations and also kill the hopes of the Big Pharma scientists who have been trying to get this type of drug passed for at least five years with no success
The person who wrote it works in producing the vaccine, so zero credibility, if you can the opposition it is not only in bad taste but shows a desperation of fear for what you are bagging
All details of connections freely available in his bio
So to me it is a ringing endorsement for Ivermectin
