Share
36,455 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 497
clock Created with Sketch.
22/04/24
10:06
Share
Originally posted by bellcurve:
↑
just a quick reiteration of a paragraph from the above report about the PRICIPLE study in the UK that looked at the impact of whether ivermectin use could be repurposed to help moderate covid symptoms. "this study finds that ultimately it is ineffective in altering the outcomes of COVID-19 infection in a largely vaccinated population. The researchers conclude that ivermectin should not be prescribed as a treatment for COVID-19 in such populations and recommend against conducting further trials on ivermectin for this purpose. " seems quite scientific to me. You conduct a study, find that use of ivermectin didn't translate into clinically meaningfulbenefits or imptovements in longer-ter health outcomes. And recommend against its use. and then some ornery critter obsessed with IVM use and who didn't participate in the study, says it was anti-science. but will promote videos produced that are designed to persuade viewers to a certain point of view. yep crazy old upside down world we have these days.
Expand
well yes ......the problem with your post is th you know something only those that know nothing at all and are completely unqualified are allowed to make assertions regarding COVID and be taken seriously LOL picked it in one ....a crazy upside down world