IVZ media thread, page-5783

To be fair SM is dammed if he does and dammed if he doesn't give time lines.
One lot whinge no time line the others whinge the company does not update.
I personally wish they had waited until the samples were in the lab before commenting.
Anyways I'm gona go out on a limb and say the CGR might well be higher than expected/anticipated.
I also have my fingers crossed for a decent Helium %.
Just to jog your collective memories,

▪ Upper Angwa initial fluid sample clean-up shows moveable gas and liquid hydrocarbons
flowing through onboard compositional fluid analyser (CFA)

Also Lower Angwa had fluorescence.
Multiple zones encountered fluorescence and strong gas shows in Lower Angwa
consistent with Mukuyu-2 original wellbore

I know Butcherano has been very critical of the amount of information that SM has delivered to market, I agree its been scant, but one could argue that if its really really good that SM would be a knucklehead to come out and state that with no proof.