Not sure how you figure that. They would have paid for a third of both wells and we would currently have 55% of the project instead of the 80% we have now. If the wells cost $50m for both Cluff would have kicked in around $17m (assuming there was no cap on well costs). With the raisings done since, that $17m probably would have been about 2oom shares. Do you think losing 25% of the project to save 200m shares would have been a good deal?
IVZ media thread, page-6395
Add IVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
5.8¢ |
Change
-0.002(3.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $82.23M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 6.0¢ | 6.2¢ | 5.8¢ | $136.8K | 2.284M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100000 | 5.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9¢ | 30399 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 06/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
5.9¢ |
Change
-0.002 ( 1.67 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 6.1¢ | 6.2¢ | 5.8¢ | 1510804 | ||
| Last updated 15.56pm 06/06/2024 ? | |||||
| IVZ (ASX) Chart |