Although not a direct quote:
MacMillan said Mutapa Investment Fund, being a 10 percent back-in rights partner in the project, and entitled to the Government’s 40 percent share of production, had a vested interest and would therefore push to finalise the PSSA, as directed by the Government.
And from the other article:
The PPSA is expected to bring significant economic and social benefits to Zimbabwe. According to MacMillan, it will allow Zimbabweans to enjoy subsidized power and fuel. The country, rich in over 60 extractable minerals, already sees more than 75% of its exports from the extractive sector. The MIF, holding a 10% partnership in the project, will be entitled to the government’s 40% share of production, furthering national interests.
The 40% has never been mentioned before and you would think that is market sensitive. No?
Although not a direct quote:MacMillan said Mutapa Investment...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
