I understand your post.IVZ is wrestling with the market. It’s...

I understand your post.

IVZ is wrestling with the market. It’s wrestling because IVZ isn’t meeting the markets expectations, and because IVZ has not planned its funding needs and fulfilled them, it is reactionary to every drill.

An example of IVZ’s reactionary behaviour. If IVZ had funds to extend M2 ST1 into the 6” zone and call TD, they would have. But factors caused them to call TD at 3300m. I’ve raised those factors, so I won’t repeat them.

I don’t believe a mid/major would have called TD at 3300m. They’d have completed the job because this job was part of a larger project portfolio, and it would have been planned, reviewed, executed, monitored, reviewed, monitored, reviewed, paused, recommenced, monitored, reviewed………….