Oh, I agree a best case scenario in all horizons is always unlikely, I'm just saying if we're going to discuss figures provided by the company we should probably acknowledge that the Upper Angwa by itself has a P10 of ~9.4tcf/420mmbbl on 650m max column height. Given the information provided by the company I think there can be reasonable and tempered discussion of figures higher than 6tcf as long as the risk involved is acknowledged. I'm trying to find the middle ground of not ignoring the worst outcomes as well as not ignoring the best outcomes given the large interval and statements so far. People should try and be conservative. It generally pays to be in this game. But I can't discount some of the variables we've been made aware of either.
